From Reuters:

ADVISORY: Backdoor taxes story
The Feb 1 story headlined “Backdoor taxes to hit middle class” is wrong and has been withdrawn. The story said lower-income families will pay more under tax provisions scheduled to expire Dec 31. The Obama administration’s budget calls for the extension of those tax provisions for households earning less than $250,000. There will be no substitute story.

I question whether this statement is actually false, since no administration makes any actual changes in the law. Until the congress acts, everything in the story stands as slated to occur. In my opinion, the retraction smacks more of cold-war Pravda than a news outlet. The story was fine until the Obama administration asked for it to be removed.

I’d like to know, “What is a substitute story?” anyway?

Such care for Obama’s reputation, even when the standing “facts” are overridden by mere request.


Tagged with:
 

2 Responses to ADVISORY: Backdoor taxes story – Which parts Are Not True?

  1. dave says:

    According to Reuters the ‘facts’ were not correct in the story. That’s why it was pulled. They will not be running a substitute story.

  2. Dave says:

    Aren’t the “facts” only untrue if Congress acts to change them? The story was pulled on the basis of what Obama is purported to have requested but Obama doesn’t pass the budget or any law. Congress does. As of now, all the facts remain until the law is changed. This was something with just a dash of flavor of Pravda obeying the Kremlin.



Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can
take care of it!

Visit our friends!

A few highly recommended friends...